Balancing Integrity and Trust: Professional Skepticism, Professional Ethics, and Auditors’ Whistleblowing Decisions in an Emerging Economy

Authors

  • Fadly Achmad A. M. Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Arifuddin Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Agus Bandang Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Abdul Rahman Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Haryanto Universitas Diponegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30741/assets.v10i2.1994

Keywords:

Professional Skepticism, Professional Ethics, Whistleblowing, Organizational Culture, Auditors, Public Accounting Firms

Abstract

This study aims to examine the influence of professional skepticism and professional ethics on auditors' decisions to engage in whistleblowing, and to assess whether organizational culture strengthens or weakens this relationship. The data was obtained through a survey of 81 auditors working at Public Accounting Firms in South Sulawesi Province. The research instrument used a closed questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression and Moderated Regression Analysis in IBM SPSS Statistics 32. The results of the study show that professional skepticism has a positive and significant effect on whistleblowing. Professional ethics also have a positive and significant effect on whistleblowing. However, organizational culture does not moderate the influence of professional skepticism or professional ethics on whistleblowing. The theoretical contribution of this research lies in the expansion of the Goal-Setting Theory in the context of auditing by showing that the professional goals that have been internalized by auditors, namely maintaining integrity, objectivity, and public responsibility, are more dominant than organizational culture factors in encouraging whistleblowing. The novelty of this research lies in testing the limits of organizational culture's role as a moderator of the relationship between individual auditor factors and whistleblowing in the context of regional Public Accounting Firms. The study also confirms that professional skepticism needs to be understood as proportionate and evidence-based, rather than excessive suspicion that can damage the audit relationship. These findings imply that strengthening whistleblowing auditors should focus on the internalization of professional ethics, training in risk-based skepticism, and a safe reporting system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., & Pike, R. (2013). Towards a conceptual model of whistle-blowing intentions among external auditors. The British Accounting Review, 45(1), 10–23.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

Curtis, M. B., & Taylor, E. Z. (2009). Whistleblowing in public accounting: Influence of identity disclosure, situational context, and personal characteristics. Accounting and the Public Interest, 9(1), 191–220.

Dyck, A., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? The Journal of Finance, 65(6), 2213–2253.

Gundlach, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2003). The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 107–123.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149–171.

Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 45–97.

International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants. (2020). Handbook of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants. International Federation of Accountants.

Kaptein, M. (2011). From inaction to external whistleblowing: The influence of the ethical culture of organizations on employee responses to observed wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 513–530.

Latan, H., Ringle, C. M., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2018). Whistleblowing intentions among public accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the moderation effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 573–588.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 277–297.

Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). Whistle-blowing in organizations. Routledge.

Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1–16.

Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (2016). After the wrongdoing: What managers should know about whistleblowing. Business Horizons, 59(1), 105–114.

Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34.

Park, H., Blenkinsopp, J., Oktem, M. K., & Omurgonulsen, U. (2008). Cultural orientation and attitudes toward different forms of whistleblowing: A comparison of South Korea, Turkey, and the U.K. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 929–939.

Quadackers, L., Groot, T., & Wright, A. (2014). Auditors’ professional skepticism: Neutrality versus presumptive doubt. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 639–657.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Seifert, D. L., Sweeney, J. T., Joireman, J., & Thornton, J. M. (2010). The influence of organizational justice on accountant whistleblowing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 707–717.

Shaub, M. K., & Lawrence, J. E. (1996). Ethics, experience and professional skepticism: A situational analysis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8, 124–157.

Sikka, P. (2009). Financial crisis and the silence of the auditors. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 868–873.

Taylor, E. Z., & Curtis, M. B. (2010). An examination of the layers of workplace influences in ethical judgments: Whistleblowing likelihood and perseverance in public accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 21–37.

Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

M., F. A. A., Arifuddin, A., Bandang, A., Rahman, A., & Haryanto, H. (2026). Balancing Integrity and Trust: Professional Skepticism, Professional Ethics, and Auditors’ Whistleblowing Decisions in an Emerging Economy. Assets : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Pajak, 10(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.30741/assets.v10i2.1994

Issue

Section

Articles