The Effect of Attitude, Subjective Norms, and Perceived Behavioral Control on Purchasing Behavior with Purchase Intention as an Intervening Variable in the TikTok Shop Affiliate Program: Evidence from Nayasalia's Account
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30741/wiga.v16i2.1482Keywords:
Attitude, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioral Control, Purchase Intention, Purchasing BehaviorAbstract
This study examines the effects of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control on purchasing behavior, with purchase intention as an intervening variable, in the Nayasalia TikTok Shop affiliate context. A quantitative explanatory survey using purposive sampling was conducted with 120 respondents who had purchased through Nayasalia’s TikTok Shop content or live sessions. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) with WarpPLS 8.0. The results show that attitude (β = 0.262; p = 0.001), subjective norms (β = 0.212; p = 0.008), and perceived behavioral control (β = 0.325; p < 0.001) significantly and positively affect purchasing behavior. They also significantly affect purchase intention: attitude (β = 0.389; p < 0.001), subjective norms (β = 0.257; p = 0.002), and perceived behavioral control (β = 0.159; p = 0.036). However, purchase intention does not significantly affect purchasing behavior (β = 0.061; p = 0.250) and does not mediate the three relationships. The model explains 60.7% of purchase intention and 66.8% of purchasing behavior. The findings imply that direct product evaluation, social influence, and transaction control may be more important for actual purchases than stated intention. Practically, affiliates should emphasize credible product demonstrations, social proof, clear information, and frictionless transactions.
Downloads
References
J. Juairiah, G. A. Busono, and D. Fadeli, “Sikap Dan Persepsi Konsumen Terhadap Keputusanpembelian Online Di Sungai Lilinmusi Banyuasin,” Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 164, 2019, doi: 10.32502/jimn.v6i2.1587.
J. A. López-Lemus, M. T. de la G. Carranza, M. Schmitt-Revilla, and J. G. López-Lemus, “The Role of Social Media and Innovation in Mexican Industrial Entrepreneurship,” Innovar, vol. 34, no. 92, 2024, doi: 10.15446/innovar.v34n92.98533.
M. Almrafee and M. Akaileh, “Customers’ purchase intention of renewable energy in Jordan: the case of solar panel systems using an extended theory of planned behavior (TPB),” International Journal of Energy Sector Management, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 457–473, 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJESM-01-2023-0002.
B. H. Sheppard, J. Hartwick, and P. R. Warshaw, “The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 325, Dec. 1988, doi: 10.1086/209170.
M. Y. Bhutto, Y. A. Soomro, and H. Yang, “Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Young Consumer Purchase Behavior of Energy-Efficient Appliances (Evidence From Developing Economy),” Sage Open, vol. 12, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1177/21582440221078289.
A. Issn, I. E. Chefe, C. Luiz, S. Avalia, and D. B. Review, “Affiliated Marketing Content in Shopee Through Tiktok Media,” pp. 1–12, 2023.
M. Y. Bhutto, Y. A. Soomro, and H. Yang, “Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Young Consumer Purchase Behavior of Energy-Efficient Appliances (Evidence From Developing Economy),” Sage Open, vol. 12, no. 1, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1177/21582440221078289/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_21582440221078289-FIG1.JPEG.
M. S. Azad, S. S. Khan, R. Hossain, R. Rahman, and S. Momen, “Predictive modeling of consumer purchase behavior on social media: Integrating theory of planned behavior and machine learning for actionable insights,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 12, p. e0296336, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0296336.
T. N. Quach, P. Thaichon, and C. Jebarajakirthy, “Revisiting the Theory of Planned Behavior for Brand Loyalty: The Role of Intention among Chinese Consumers of High-involvement Products,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 30, pp. 1–11, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.12.002.
S. Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Revised edition. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2019.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (revised edition). Alfabeta, 2019.
I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991, doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
I. Ghozali, Structural Equation Modeling: Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square (PLS), 4th ed. Semarang, Indonesia: Universitas Diponegoro, 2021.
E. A. Setiawan and M. Fadhilah, “Strategis Promosi Digital Marketing Pada Distributor Keramik Di Yogyakarta,” Jurnal Teknologi Dan Manajemen …, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal-tmit.com/index.php/home/article/view/286
M. Sholihin and D. Ratmono, Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 7.0 untuk Hubungan Nonlinier dalam Penelitian Sosial dan Bisnis, 2nd ed. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nadia Asalia Fathimah Zahra, Dwi Cahyono, Abadi Sanosra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




